Now that we have legal threats flying around I'd like to go on the record with the following statement for Rossco to submit to his crack legal team seeing as I've posted a humorous take earlier in the thread.
- This machine is not in 'very good condition'
- No reasonable or honest person would describe this machine as being in 'very good condition'
- Describing this machine as being in 'very good condition' was active misrepresentation.
- This machine has some of the most extensive playfield damage I've seen on any machine for sale over the past eighteen years that wasn't described as a project machine requiring extensive refurbishment.
- The fact that the machine is fully working does not render the above mute. A machine can be fully working but in very poor condition. Case in point if this machine is indeed fully working.
- The fact that this machine is 30 years old is irrelevant. Items that are 30 years old can be in very good condition, or very poor condition. The latter applies here.
- The fact that the seller made the buyer aware he 'needed the money' for another purchase is entirely irrelevant.
- There are plenty of resources available on this site alone to help you ascertain the condition and value of a machine.
Now let's look at some evidence. The last Funhouse advertised for sale on the forum was from
@new forest pinball last December:
Hi all, Hopefully you are all having a good break. Here we have a 1991 Williams Funhouse pinball machine for sale. Sticking closely to recent sales thread guidelines and feedback, here’s the story. MACHINE HISTORY. This machine was one of our first mint restoration jobs back in 2007/2008. It was...
www.pinballinfo.com
This machine was described as being in 'excellent players condition', which is a more conservative description than 'very good condition'. It was advertised for just £150 more than than
@Ads Nems paid for the disaster of a machine in question. Let's compare.
'Excellent players condition'
'Very good condition'
'Excellent players condition'
'Very good condition'
'Excellent players condition'
'Very good condition'
I stand by all my earlier statements and look forward to being sued for defamation of character and/or libel despite not naming the seller nor knowing who he is.
In previous posts I described him as being a prick. Now that he is threatening legal action I would like to apologise and retract this statement. The seller isn't a prick. He's a massive, massive prick.