So...much talk of Munsters et al, but at under £5.5k straight out of the box, does anyone have a fresh point of view on Thunderbirds?
The look on your face in the stream you shared while playing it said it all.its a turd.
That's a bit harsh Neil.its a turd.
What about the multi Ball start where the ball came out of the swimming pool like TB1.When I played it, it just felt cheap. Stripped down. In the 90s when you played a new pin they usually had something unique about them ...
TAF _ the power, thing flips
TZ _ the clock, ceramic ball, mini pf ..
MB - frankie, the auto flip main flippers
Sttng - the guns
ToM - the trunk
BSD - mist magnet thing
Most games had something. Even very basic fish tales has the fish topper
There was no love put into Thunderbirds, nothing special at all that I could see. When I played it, it felt like playing a late 80s machine really. Or a weak DE alpha numeric
What is wrong with it then? The above doesn't really explain it very well other than in general "it's not as good as WPC" terms (no offence).
That's a bit harsh Neil.
I don't know the score but that is a strong statement to make on a public forum if it's based off of anecdotal info.Also Mike has stitched up a bunch of folks who paid for the game in .OZ he’s no better than Andrew Heighway, Homepin are a crook outfit.