good playfield vs bad - pls can people post close ups?

[cooldan]

me again



i often read on ebay and the yahoo group about a good or a bad playfield, but it's not always clear to me. obviously it's easy when the pf has deep gouges, or a big triangular burn where someone has left a hot iron on it for too long, i'm not a total newb, but i don't have the experience a lot of you guys have.



so please can someone kind and photo-savvy post some subtle example of when average becomes bad? is it just inserts i'm supposed to look at? or scratched ramps? surely on a 1990's game, all pfs are gonna look crappy unless they've been sored in a vacuum and never played (/drool)



i thanks you. is nice!



[attachment=710:stormtrooper car.jpg]

 

[Rus121]

Bad:





Mega bad:







Brand new refurb:

 

[replicas]

Thats one nasty AFM.

Here's a Black Rose with the classic I can't be ****d to alter the cannon, thus the damage is causes from not being set correctly.

[attachment=713:ebay 001.jpg]

And a picture of a playfield that got a little better looked after.

[attachment=714:ebay 002.jpg]

 

[roadshow16]

what's wet willy doing under there?

 

[replicas]

Its a new prototype.

Come on I have to lay it down to take the picture, and White Water was closest.

 

[jonathan]

Basically a good playfield should have no bare wood or raised inserts

 

[cooldan]

so far these are all easy to spot. thanks guys, keep em coming, i wanna see something more subtle